Seeking to understand in-depth how small and local charities reacted during the first national lockdown and through to the autumn, this new research showed how:
- Small and local charities’ distinctive role put them in the best place to respond to this crisis, they ‘showed up and stuck around’ using their position of trust for the most vulnerable in their community when they were needed the most.
- These charities have created social, economic and added value for their communities and demonstrated greater absorptive and adaptive capacity through their resilience.
- A thriving and resilient population of small and local charities with the absorptive and adaptive capacity to respond to different types and scale of shock should be an explicit goal of public policy at a national and local level.
Being able to bring this study to fruition has been satisfying for lots of reasons, not least because it’s a really good report! I want to highlight some here.
Our research
The first is that investing in research – documenting independent evidence of an extraordinary period – was an important part of our strategic response to COVID, pursued with the same urgency as our direct financial and non-financial support to our grantees.
As part of our objective to champion the role and work of small charities, we had already invested in a small - but hopefully vital! - portfolio of research.
In April 2020, the policy, communications and research team at the Foundation brainstormed ways that we could respond to the crisis - our early conversations with charities during the first national lockdown revealed the extraordinary lengths they were going to meet the needs of their communities.
Investing in research is one way that we can support a thriving population of small charities.
We are privileged as an independent funder to be able to move quickly to opportunities - we were equally fortunate to have worked with a research team who recognised that same opportunity.
Secondly, it has been a chance to fund longitudinal qualitative research. By revisiting the same communities and case study charities used in the original 2018, the research team were able to quickly re-establish contact and conduct fieldwork at speed.